# gluetun vs Urbit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | gluetun | Urbit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 56 in VPN | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 15 909 ✓ | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +311 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v3.41.3 · 30 Jul 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | hoon |

## Which one should you pick?

gluetun scores 75/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.

gluetun ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.

If you want the quickest setup, gluetun is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

gluetun is growing faster right now (+311 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [gluetun](https://selfhost.directory/project/gluetun) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gluetun.md)
- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gluetun-vs-urbit