# gluetun vs scanopy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | gluetun | scanopy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 56 in VPN | #1 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 15 907 ✓ | 5 913 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +309 ✓ | +119 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 40 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.41.3 · 30 Jul 2026 | v0.19.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

gluetun scores 75/100 against 64/100 for scanopy, so it is the safer default.

scanopy ships more often: 40 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for gluetun.

gluetun is growing faster right now (+309 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [gluetun](https://selfhost.directory/project/gluetun) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gluetun.md)
- [scanopy](https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gluetun-vs-scanopy