# gluetun vs openHop Repeater

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | gluetun | openHop Repeater |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 56 in VPN | #2 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 15 906 ✓ | 298 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +308 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v3.41.3 · 30 Jul 2026 | 1.1.4 · 8 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

gluetun scores 75/100 against 51/100 for openHop Repeater, so it is the safer default.

gluetun ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openHop Repeater.

If you want the quickest setup, gluetun is easier to run; openHop Repeater needs more configuration.

gluetun is growing faster right now (+308 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [gluetun](https://selfhost.directory/project/gluetun) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gluetun.md)
- [openHop Repeater](https://selfhost.directory/project/openhop-repeater) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openhop-repeater.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gluetun-vs-openhop-repeater