# gluetun vs Gogs

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | gluetun | Gogs |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 56 in VPN | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 15 915 | 47 907 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +304 ✓ | +75 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v3.41.3 · 30 Jul 2026 ✓ | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Gogs scores 80/100 against 75/100 for gluetun, so it is the safer default.

gluetun ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Gogs.

If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; gluetun needs more configuration.

gluetun is growing faster right now (+304 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [gluetun](https://selfhost.directory/project/gluetun) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gluetun.md)
- [Gogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gluetun-vs-gogs