# globalping-probe vs Shinobi

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | globalping-probe | Shinobi |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #29 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #3 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 215 ✓ | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.54.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | ISC | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | — |

## Which one should you pick?

Shinobi scores 66/100 against 48/100 for globalping-probe, so it is the safer default.

globalping-probe ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shinobi.

If you want the quickest setup, globalping-probe is easier to run; Shinobi needs more configuration.

## Details

- [globalping-probe](https://selfhost.directory/project/globalping-probe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/globalping-probe.md)
- [Shinobi](https://selfhost.directory/project/shinobi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/shinobi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/globalping-probe-vs-shinobi