# globalping-probe vs qdrant

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | globalping-probe | qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #29 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 215 | 35 301 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +530 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 14 |
| Latest release | v0.54.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | ISC | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

qdrant scores 82/100 against 48/100 for globalping-probe, so it is the safer default.

globalping-probe ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for qdrant.

If you want the quickest setup, globalping-probe is easier to run; qdrant needs more configuration.

qdrant is growing faster right now (+530 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [globalping-probe](https://selfhost.directory/project/globalping-probe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/globalping-probe.md)
- [qdrant](https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/globalping-probe-vs-qdrant