# globalping-probe vs Nomad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | globalping-probe | Nomad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #29 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 215 | 17 052 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 19 |
| Latest release | v0.54.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | ISC | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Nomad scores 76/100 against 48/100 for globalping-probe, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, globalping-probe is easier to run; Nomad needs more configuration.

Nomad is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [globalping-probe](https://selfhost.directory/project/globalping-probe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/globalping-probe.md)
- [Nomad](https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/globalping-probe-vs-nomad