# globalping-probe vs Nezha

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | globalping-probe | Nezha |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #29 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #15 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 215 | 10 377 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +41 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 40 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.54.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | ISC | WTFPL |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Nezha scores 72/100 against 48/100 for globalping-probe, so it is the safer default.

Nezha ships more often: 40 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for globalping-probe.

If you want the quickest setup, globalping-probe is easier to run; Nezha needs more configuration.

Nezha is growing faster right now (+41 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [globalping-probe](https://selfhost.directory/project/globalping-probe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/globalping-probe.md)
- [Nezha](https://selfhost.directory/project/nezha) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nezha.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/globalping-probe-vs-nezha