# globalping-probe vs motionEye

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | globalping-probe | motionEye |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 65/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #29 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 215 | 4 720 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +35 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.54.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | ISC | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

motionEye scores 65/100 against 48/100 for globalping-probe, so it is the safer default.

globalping-probe ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.

motionEye is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [globalping-probe](https://selfhost.directory/project/globalping-probe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/globalping-probe.md)
- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/globalping-probe-vs-motioneye