# globalping-probe vs HiClaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | globalping-probe | HiClaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 67/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #29 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #32 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 215 | 5 886 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +223 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 15 |
| Latest release | v0.54.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | ISC | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

HiClaw scores 67/100 against 48/100 for globalping-probe, so it is the safer default.

globalping-probe ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for HiClaw.

HiClaw is growing faster right now (+223 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [globalping-probe](https://selfhost.directory/project/globalping-probe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/globalping-probe.md)
- [HiClaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/globalping-probe-vs-hiclaw