# GitSave vs UrBackup

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | GitSave | UrBackup |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 60/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 15 in Backup Management | #18 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 340 | 943 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.4.0 · 26 Sept 2026 ✓ | 2.5.38 · 30 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

UrBackup scores 60/100 against 46/100 for GitSave, so it is the safer default.

UrBackup ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for GitSave.

If you want the quickest setup, GitSave is easier to run; UrBackup needs more configuration.

UrBackup is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [GitSave](https://selfhost.directory/project/gitsave) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gitsave.md)
- [UrBackup](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbackup) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbackup.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gitsave-vs-urbackup