GitSavevsUrBackup
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| GitSave | UrBackup | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 15 in Backup Management | #18 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 340 | 943 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 9 |
| Latest release | 1.4.0 · 26 Sept 2026 | 2.5.38 · 30 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
UrBackup scores 60/100 against 46/100 for GitSave, so it is the safer default.
UrBackup ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for GitSave.
If you want the quickest setup, GitSave is easier to run; UrBackup needs more configuration.
UrBackup is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).
GitSave details →UrBackup details →
Swap a project
Keep GitSave, compare it with
Keep UrBackup, compare it with