# Gitness vs WhisperLive---CPU

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gitness | WhisperLive---CPU |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 38 745 ✓ | 4 337 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +318 ✓ | +45 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Gitness scores 80/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.

Gitness ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.

If you want the quickest setup, Gitness is easier to run; WhisperLive---CPU needs more configuration.

Gitness is growing faster right now (+318 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gitness](https://selfhost.directory/project/gitness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gitness.md)
- [WhisperLive---CPU](https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gitness-vs-whisperlive-cpu