# Gitness vs self-hosted-livesync-server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gitness | self-hosted-livesync-server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #37 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 38 753 ✓ | 274 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +319 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Gitness scores 80/100 against 45/100 for self-hosted-livesync-server, so it is the safer default.

Gitness ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for self-hosted-livesync-server.

If you want the quickest setup, Gitness is easier to run; self-hosted-livesync-server needs more configuration.

Gitness is growing faster right now (+319 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gitness](https://selfhost.directory/project/gitness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gitness.md)
- [self-hosted-livesync-server](https://selfhost.directory/project/self-hosted-livesync-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/self-hosted-livesync-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gitness-vs-self-hosted-livesync-server