# Gitness vs polar

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gitness | polar |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #1 of 13 in Billing |
| GitHub stars | 38 762 ✓ | 10 437 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +328 ✓ | +158 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 | @polar-sh/cli@3.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Gitness scores 80/100 against 71/100 for polar, so it is the safer default.

Gitness ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for polar.

If you want the quickest setup, Gitness is easier to run; polar needs more configuration.

Gitness is growing faster right now (+328 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gitness](https://selfhost.directory/project/gitness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gitness.md)
- [polar](https://selfhost.directory/project/polar) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/polar.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gitness-vs-polar