# Gitness vs kubo

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gitness | kubo |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #6 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 38 753 ✓ | 17 161 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +319 ✓ | +19 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 | v0.43.1 · 14 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Gitness scores 80/100 against 71/100 for kubo, so it is the safer default.

kubo ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Gitness.

If you want the quickest setup, Gitness is easier to run; kubo needs more configuration.

Gitness is growing faster right now (+319 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gitness](https://selfhost.directory/project/gitness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gitness.md)
- [kubo](https://selfhost.directory/project/kubo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kubo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gitness-vs-kubo