# Gitness vs ADAMANT IPFS Node

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gitness | ADAMANT IPFS Node |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #8 of 15 in File Storage |
| GitHub stars | 38 746 ✓ | 307 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +319 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 | v0.1.0 · 30 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Gitness scores 80/100 against 48/100 for ADAMANT IPFS Node, so it is the safer default.

Gitness ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for ADAMANT IPFS Node.

If you want the quickest setup, Gitness is easier to run; ADAMANT IPFS Node needs more configuration.

Gitness is growing faster right now (+319 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gitness](https://selfhost.directory/project/gitness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gitness.md)
- [ADAMANT IPFS Node](https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-node) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-node.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gitness-vs-ipfs-node