# Gitea vs Zero-K

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gitea | Zero-K |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Code Hosting | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 58 751 ✓ | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +611 ✓ | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v28.2.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Lua |

## Which one should you pick?

Gitea scores 89/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.

Gitea ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.

If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; Gitea needs more configuration.

Gitea is growing faster right now (+611 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gitea](https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea.md)
- [Zero-K](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gitea-vs-zero-k