# Gitea vs Warpgate

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gitea | Warpgate |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 ✓ | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Code Hosting | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 58 742 ✓ | 8 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +602 ✓ | +198 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 33 ✓ |
| Latest release | v28.2.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Gitea scores 89/100 against 75/100 for Warpgate, so it is the safer default.

Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for Gitea.

If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; Gitea needs more configuration.

Gitea is growing faster right now (+602 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gitea](https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea.md)
- [Warpgate](https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gitea-vs-warpgate