# Gitea vs url-to-png

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gitea | url-to-png |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Code Hosting | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 58 747 ✓ | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +607 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v28.2.0 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Gitea scores 89/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.

Gitea ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.

If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; Gitea needs more configuration.

Gitea is growing faster right now (+607 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gitea](https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea.md)
- [url-to-png](https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gitea-vs-url-to-png