# Gitea vs unbagrnd

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gitea | unbagrnd |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Code Hosting | #10 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 58 761 ✓ | 178 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +608 ✓ | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v28.2.0 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Gitea scores 89/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.

Gitea ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for unbagrnd.

If you want the quickest setup, unbagrnd is easier to run; Gitea needs more configuration.

Gitea is growing faster right now (+608 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gitea](https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea.md)
- [unbagrnd](https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gitea-vs-unbagrnd