# Gitea vs uMap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gitea | uMap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Code Hosting | #3 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 58 743 ✓ | 1 628 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +603 ✓ | +25 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v28.2.0 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.8.1 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Gitea scores 89/100 against 64/100 for uMap, so it is the safer default.

Gitea ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for uMap.

Gitea is growing faster right now (+603 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gitea](https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea.md)
- [uMap](https://selfhost.directory/project/umap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gitea-vs-umap