# Gitea vs Umami

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gitea | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 ✓ | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Code Hosting | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 58 751 ✓ | 39 757 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +611 | +776 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | v28.2.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Gitea scores 89/100 against 85/100 for Umami, so it is the safer default.

Gitea ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Umami.

If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; Gitea needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Gitea](https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea.md)
- [Umami](https://selfhost.directory/project/umami) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umami.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gitea-vs-umami