# Gitea vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gitea | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 ✓ | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Code Hosting | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 58 745 | 117 750 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +605 | +5 391 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v28.2.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Gitea scores 89/100 against 86/100 for TradingAgents, so it is the safer default.

Gitea ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 391 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gitea](https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gitea-vs-tradingagents