# Gitea vs subarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gitea | subarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Code Hosting | #79 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 58 763 ✓ | 147 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +610 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v28.2.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | v2.7.25 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Gitea scores 89/100 against 48/100 for subarr, so it is the safer default.

Gitea ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for subarr.

If you want the quickest setup, Gitea is easier to run; subarr needs more configuration.

Gitea is growing faster right now (+610 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gitea](https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea.md)
- [subarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/subarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/subarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gitea-vs-subarr