# Gitea vs SonarQube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gitea | SonarQube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Code Hosting | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 58 761 ✓ | 11 125 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +608 ✓ | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v28.2.0 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Gitea scores 89/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.

Gitea ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SonarQube.

If you want the quickest setup, Gitea is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.

Gitea is growing faster right now (+608 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gitea](https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea.md)
- [SonarQube](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gitea-vs-sonarqube