# Gitea vs Pulse

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gitea | Pulse |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Code Hosting | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 58 745 ✓ | 6 970 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +605 ✓ | +229 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 43 ✓ |
| Latest release | v28.2.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Gitea scores 89/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.

Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for Gitea.

If you want the quickest setup, Pulse is easier to run; Gitea needs more configuration.

Gitea is growing faster right now (+605 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gitea](https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea.md)
- [Pulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gitea-vs-pulse