# Gitea vs portabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gitea | portabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Code Hosting | #3 of 15 in Backup Management |
| GitHub stars | 58 743 ✓ | 1 860 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +603 ✓ | +95 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 64 ✓ |
| Latest release | v28.2.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | 1.35.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Gitea scores 89/100 against 60/100 for portabase, so it is the safer default.

portabase ships more often: 64 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for Gitea.

Gitea is growing faster right now (+603 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gitea](https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea.md)
- [portabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/portabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/portabase.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gitea-vs-portabase