# Gitea vs Nightingale

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gitea | Nightingale |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 ✓ | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Code Hosting | #15 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 58 756 ✓ | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +603 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v28.2.0 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Gitea scores 89/100 against 58/100 for Nightingale, so it is the safer default.

Gitea ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Nightingale.

If you want the quickest setup, Gitea is easier to run; Nightingale needs more configuration.

Gitea is growing faster right now (+603 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gitea](https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea.md)
- [Nightingale](https://selfhost.directory/project/nightingale) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nightingale.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gitea-vs-nightingale