# Gitea vs Incus

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gitea | Incus |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 ✓ | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Code Hosting | #3 of 44 in Container Management |
| GitHub stars | 58 740 ✓ | 6 515 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +600 ✓ | +275 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 16 |
| Latest release | v28.2.0 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.0.2 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Gitea scores 89/100 against 75/100 for Incus, so it is the safer default.

Gitea ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Incus.

If you want the quickest setup, Gitea is easier to run; Incus needs more configuration.

Gitea is growing faster right now (+600 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gitea](https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea.md)
- [Incus](https://selfhost.directory/project/incus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/incus.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gitea-vs-incus