# Gitea vs Healthchecks

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gitea | Healthchecks |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Code Hosting | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 58 745 ✓ | 10 465 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +605 ✓ | +107 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v28.2.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Gitea scores 89/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.

Gitea ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.

Gitea is growing faster right now (+605 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gitea](https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea.md)
- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gitea-vs-healthchecks