# Gitea vs github-actions-cache-server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gitea | github-actions-cache-server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Code Hosting | #22 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 58 747 ✓ | 459 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +607 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v28.2.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | v10.0.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Gitea scores 89/100 against 49/100 for github-actions-cache-server, so it is the safer default.

github-actions-cache-server ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for Gitea.

Gitea is growing faster right now (+607 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gitea](https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gitea.md)
- [github-actions-cache-server](https://selfhost.directory/project/github-actions-cache-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/github-actions-cache-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gitea-vs-github-actions-cache-server