# gitbucket vs SRS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | gitbucket | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 14 in Code Hosting | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 9 418 | 29 391 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +14 | +112 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | 4.48.0 · 20 Sept 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Scala | C |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 68/100 for gitbucket, so it is the safer default.

SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for gitbucket.

If you want the quickest setup, gitbucket is easier to run; SRS needs more configuration.

SRS is growing faster right now (+112 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [gitbucket](https://selfhost.directory/project/gitbucket) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gitbucket.md)
- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gitbucket-vs-srs