# gitbucket vs Project N.O.M.A.D.

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | gitbucket | Project N.O.M.A.D. |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 14 in Code Hosting | #1 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 9 418 | 41 189 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +14 | +2 838 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | 4.48.0 · 20 Sept 2026 | v1.35.1 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Scala | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Project N.O.M.A.D. scores 85/100 against 68/100 for gitbucket, so it is the safer default.

Project N.O.M.A.D. ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for gitbucket.

If you want the quickest setup, gitbucket is easier to run; Project N.O.M.A.D. needs more configuration.

Project N.O.M.A.D. is growing faster right now (+2 838 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [gitbucket](https://selfhost.directory/project/gitbucket) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gitbucket.md)
- [Project N.O.M.A.D.](https://selfhost.directory/project/project-n-o-m-a-d) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/project-n-o-m-a-d.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gitbucket-vs-project-n-o-m-a-d