gigapipevsopenadserver
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| gigapipe | openadserver | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #36 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #122 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 1 721 | 258 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +14 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.6.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
gigapipe scores 62/100 against 42/100 for openadserver, so it is the safer default.
gigapipe ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for openadserver.
If you want the quickest setup, openadserver is easier to run; gigapipe needs more configuration.
gigapipe is growing faster right now (+14 stars in 30 days).
gigapipe details →openadserver details →
Swap a project
Keep gigapipe, compare it with
Keep openadserver, compare it with