# gigapipe vs monoscope

> Two self-hosted [Datadog alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/datadog), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | gigapipe | monoscope |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #37 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #40 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 718 | 2 006 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +11 | +174 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 ✓ | 14 |
| Latest release | v5.6.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.31 · 10 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Haskell |

## Which one should you pick?

gigapipe scores 61/100 against 60/100 for monoscope, so it is the safer default.

gigapipe ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for monoscope.

If you want the quickest setup, monoscope is easier to run; gigapipe needs more configuration.

monoscope is growing faster right now (+174 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [gigapipe](https://selfhost.directory/project/gigapipe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gigapipe.md)
- [monoscope](https://selfhost.directory/project/monoscope) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/monoscope.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Langfuse vs netdata](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-netdata)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gigapipe-vs-monoscope