gigapipevsmonoscope
Two self-hosted Datadog alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| gigapipe | monoscope | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #37 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #40 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 718 | 2 006 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +11 | +174 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 14 |
| Latest release | v5.6.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.6.31 · 10 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Haskell |
Which one should you pick?
gigapipe scores 61/100 against 60/100 for monoscope, so it is the safer default.
gigapipe ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for monoscope.
If you want the quickest setup, monoscope is easier to run; gigapipe needs more configuration.
monoscope is growing faster right now (+174 stars in 30 days).
gigapipe details →monoscope details → All Datadog alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep gigapipe, compare it with
Keep monoscope, compare it with