# GhostHub vs Stash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | GhostHub | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #66 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 13 308 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +302 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | v5.3.0 · 25 May 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 48/100 for GhostHub, so it is the safer default.

Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for GhostHub.

If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; GhostHub needs more configuration.

Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [GhostHub](https://selfhost.directory/project/ghosthub) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ghosthub.md)
- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ghosthub-vs-stash