# GhostHub vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | GhostHub | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #66 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 93 286 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +58 012 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | v5.3.0 · 25 May 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 48/100 for GhostHub, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for GhostHub.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 012 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [GhostHub](https://selfhost.directory/project/ghosthub) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ghosthub.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ghosthub-vs-omnivoice-studio