# Ghostfolio vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Ghostfolio | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 62 in Personal Finance | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 9 597 ✓ | 6 048 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +257 ✓ | +101 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 104 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 3.94.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Ghostfolio scores 75/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.

Ghostfolio ships more often: 104 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

If you want the quickest setup, Ghostfolio is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

Ghostfolio is growing faster right now (+257 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Ghostfolio](https://selfhost.directory/project/ghostfolio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ghostfolio.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ghostfolio-vs-zammad