# ghostboard vs Komga

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ghostboard | Komga |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #21 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #6 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 342 | 6 795 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +107 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 1.29.2 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | HTML | Kotlin |

## Which one should you pick?

Komga scores 73/100 against 48/100 for ghostboard, so it is the safer default.

Komga ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ghostboard.

If you want the quickest setup, ghostboard is easier to run; Komga needs more configuration.

Komga is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ghostboard](https://selfhost.directory/project/ghostboard) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ghostboard.md)
- [Komga](https://selfhost.directory/project/komga) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/komga.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ghostboard-vs-komga