# Ghost vs unbagrnd

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Ghost | unbagrnd |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 42 in Content Management | #10 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 55 632 ✓ | 178 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +208 ✓ | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 41 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v6.73.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Ghost scores 83/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.

Ghost ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for unbagrnd.

If you want the quickest setup, unbagrnd is easier to run; Ghost needs more configuration.

Ghost is growing faster right now (+208 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Ghost](https://selfhost.directory/project/ghost) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ghost.md)
- [unbagrnd](https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Ghost vs Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ghost-vs-payload-cms)
- [directus vs Ghost](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-ghost)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ghost-vs-unbagrnd