# Ghost vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Ghost | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 42 in Content Management | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 55 631 | 117 816 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +221 | +5 457 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 41 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v6.73.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 83/100 for Ghost, so it is the safer default.

Ghost ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Ghost](https://selfhost.directory/project/ghost) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ghost.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Ghost vs Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ghost-vs-payload-cms)
- [directus vs Ghost](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-ghost)
- [Ghost vs Wagtail](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ghost-vs-wagtail)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ghost-vs-tradingagents