# Ghost vs openwhisk

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Ghost | openwhisk |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 42 in Content Management | #2 of 7 in Serverless |
| GitHub stars | 55 631 ✓ | 6 803 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +221 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 41 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.73.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Scala |

## Which one should you pick?

Ghost scores 83/100 against 67/100 for openwhisk, so it is the safer default.

Ghost ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for openwhisk.

If you want the quickest setup, Ghost is easier to run; openwhisk needs more configuration.

Ghost is growing faster right now (+221 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Ghost](https://selfhost.directory/project/ghost) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ghost.md)
- [openwhisk](https://selfhost.directory/project/openwhisk) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openwhisk.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Ghost vs Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ghost-vs-payload-cms)
- [directus vs Ghost](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-ghost)
- [Ghost vs Wagtail](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ghost-vs-wagtail)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ghost-vs-openwhisk