# geth-ethereum vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | geth-ethereum | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Blockchain | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 51 449 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +81 | +83 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.17.10 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

geth-ethereum scores 86/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

geth-ethereum ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

## Details

- [geth-ethereum](https://selfhost.directory/project/geth-ethereum) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/geth-ethereum.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/geth-ethereum-vs-tube-archivist