# GeoServer vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | GeoServer | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Maps | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 4 485 | 8 652 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 | +153 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | 2.27.7 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

GeoServer scores 71/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

GeoServer ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; GeoServer needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+153 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [GeoServer](https://selfhost.directory/project/geoserver) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/geoserver.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/geoserver-vs-workout-cool