# GeoServer vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | GeoServer | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Maps | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 4 485 | 8 066 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 | +158 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.27.7 · 18 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 71/100 for GeoServer, so it is the safer default.

woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for GeoServer.

woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+158 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [GeoServer](https://selfhost.directory/project/geoserver) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/geoserver.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/geoserver-vs-woodpecker-ci