# geopulse vs wlgblock

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | geopulse | wlgblock |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 ✓ | 34/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Location Tracking | #72 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 1 466 ✓ | 177 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +54 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Java | C |

## Which one should you pick?

geopulse scores 64/100 against 34/100 for wlgblock, so it is the safer default.

geopulse ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for wlgblock.

If you want the quickest setup, geopulse is easier to run; wlgblock needs more configuration.

geopulse is growing faster right now (+54 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [geopulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse.md)
- [wlgblock](https://selfhost.directory/project/wlgblock) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wlgblock.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/geopulse-vs-wlgblock