# geopulse vs WindowsinDocker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | geopulse | WindowsinDocker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Location Tracking | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 1 466 | 53 765 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +54 | +370 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 64/100 for geopulse, so it is the safer default.

geopulse ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for WindowsinDocker.

If you want the quickest setup, geopulse is easier to run; WindowsinDocker needs more configuration.

WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+370 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [geopulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse.md)
- [WindowsinDocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/geopulse-vs-windowsindocker