# geopulse vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | geopulse | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Location Tracking | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 1 466 | 2 675 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +54 ✓ | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.18.31 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

geopulse scores 64/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.

geopulse ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for WBO.

geopulse is growing faster right now (+54 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [geopulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/geopulse.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/geopulse-vs-wbo